Legal Opinion

People v. Frantz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2005No. 02CA0463PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

Defendant, William J. Frantz, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a schedule II controlled substance and possession with intent to manufacture a schedule II controlled substance. We affirm.

In 2000, defendant’s wife was arrested for shoplifting four packages of cold medicine. She told police that she and defendant extracted pseudoephedrine from cold medicine tablets by dissolving them in water, a preliminary stage in manufacturing methamphetamine, and that they intended to and had talked about exchanging…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. VerenColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. NerudColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. TweedyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. HarteColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Peo v. PedersenColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API