Legal Opinion

Wo v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927No. 2929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case was classified by the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article and assessed for duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The importers in their protest claimed classification under paragraph 503 of the act, and for the assessment of duty thereon at the rate applicable ’ for sugar in sugar cane not in its natural state. The relevant part of that paragraph is for—

sugar cane in its natural state, $1 per ton of two thousand pounds; sugar contained in dried sugar cane, or in sugar cane in any other than its natural…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Shing Shun & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Knickerbocker Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. A. Spaeth & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Bjelland, Lange & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Bjelland, Lange & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API