Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & Kemikalija

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Gavagan, J.

This is a motion to stay arbitration. The admission of liability subsequent to the commencement of the arbitration proceedings does not justify a stay of such proceedings. Once the arbitration proceeding has been duly commenced, it depends upon the state of matters at the time of the commencement thereof, not what occurred thereafter, and, if the circumstances be such, then, to invest jurisdiction. The same cannot be ousted by any subsequent event (Koppel v. Heinrichs, 1 Barb. 449, 451; Hodgens v. Columbia Trust Co., 103 Misc. 415, revd. on other grounds 185 App. Div. 555). And the same holds…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koppel v. HeinrichsNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Hodgens v. Columbia Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Hodgens v. Columbia Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & KemikalijaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API