Semel v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nat Tully Semel v. Commissioner.
Semel v. Commissioner
Docket No. 916-62.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-232; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 97; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 1176; T.C.M. (RIA) 65232;
August 27, 1965
Jules Ritholz, for the petitioner. Alan L. Swartz, for the respondent.
FORRESTER
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
FORRESTER, Judge: The respondent determined deficiencies in the petitioner's income tax and additions to the tax as follows:
Addition to Tax
Sec. 6653(a),
Year
Deficiency
I.R.C. 1954
1955
$ 8,117.70
$405.89
1956
9,622.20
1957
9,610.04
$27,349.94
$405.89
Several of the issues raised by the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McElroy v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014