Legal Opinion

Beehler v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1930No. 27,633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a libel action. Plaintiff sued for $50,000 damages. He had a verdict for $200. He appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. His motion was made on the grounds that the verdict was not justified by the evidence and was contrary to law and that errors occurred at the trial which were duly excepted to by him.

As there was a verdict in his favor, upon the state of the record, he cannot take advantage of the grounds claimed. For the first time in this court he urges that the verdict Avas given under passion and prejudice. That claim is not here available to him. G. S. 1923…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. English v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Garden Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API