Curtis W. Boyles, Individually and D/B/A Pace Oil & Gas Company v. Exxon Corporation, and Exxon Texas, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
NUMBER 13-01-689-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
CURTIS W. BOYLES, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
PACE OIL AND GAS COMPANY, Appellants,
v.
EXXON CORPORATION, AND EXXON TEXAS,
INC., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
HUMBLE OIL AND REFINING CO., Appellees.
On appeal from the 24th District Court
of Refugio County, Texas.
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Dorsey
Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez
Curtis W. Boyles, individually and doing business as Pace Oil & Gas Company (“Boyles”), sued Exxon Corporation and Exxon Texas, Inc., as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.