Legal Opinion

Curtis W. Boyles, Individually and D/B/A Pace Oil & Gas Company v. Exxon Corporation, and Exxon Texas, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 10, 2005No. 13-01-00689-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-01-689-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CURTIS W. BOYLES, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

PACE OIL AND GAS COMPANY, Appellants,

v.

EXXON CORPORATION, AND EXXON TEXAS,

INC., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO

HUMBLE OIL AND REFINING CO., Appellees.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Refugio County, Texas.

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Dorsey

Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

Curtis W. Boyles, individually and doing business as Pace Oil & Gas Company (“Boyles”), sued Exxon Corporation and Exxon Texas, Inc., as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API