Legal Opinion

Saif Corp. v. O'neal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1995No. WCB 91-12978; CA A81987Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that requires it to pay an out-of-compensation attorney fee award directly to claimant’s attorney, despite the fact that the compensation due to claimant has been paid in full. We affirm.

On July 19, 1991, claimant left work because of a compensable back injury. Her employer was noncomplying and, on August 21, 1991, the Compliance Division referred the case to SAIF for processing. The Compliance Division believed, at that time, that claimant’s hourly wage was $5.50. On September 3, 1991, SAIF began paying temporary total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lebanon Plywood v. SeiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. O'NEAL v. TewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. SAIF Corp. v. RapaichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API