Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 16, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion
At Law. Action by David Solomon against the Pemisylvahia Railroad Company. On motion to remand to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
A motion has been made to remand this action to the state court upon a claim that the removal proceedings were not instituted until after expiration of the time provided for re*232moval by section 29 of the Judicial Code. The provision in question is as follows:
“Whenever any party entitled to remove any suit * * * may desire to remove such suit, * * * he may make and file a. petition, duly verified, in such suit in such state court at the time, or any time before the defendant is required by the laws of the state or the rule of the state court in which such suit is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905
- Mayer v. Ft. Worth & D. C. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- Williams v. Wilson Fruit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1915
- Russell v. Harriman Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hager v. New York Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927