Legal Opinion

Mechanicville Urban Renewal Agency v. Bruno

New York County Courts

Decided January 15, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoren N. Brown, J.

Defendants move, by order to show cause dated December 5, 1975, for an order confirming the report of the commissioners of appraisal herein dated July 18, 1975, together with an allowance of appropriate interest on the award, costs and disbursements, as well as an extra allowance of costs in the amount of 5%. In addition, defendants move for an order directing plaintiff to reimburse defendants for the expenses incurred by defendants in the amount of $1,075 as a taxable disbursement incurred in payment of a real estate expert called by them.

The only issue to be resolved by the court is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Hempstead Bank v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Van Patten v. SylviaNew York Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Town of GeddesNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Elliott v. E. T. Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Legislature of Monroe v. LubelleNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  4. White Plains Urban Renewal Agency v. TencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API