Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 24, 1986No. 66671PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

502 So.2d 409 (1986)

Nathaniel JACKSON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66671.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 24, 1986.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1987.

Arthur S. Corrales, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

EHRLICH, Justice.

Appellant, Nathaniel Jackson, appeals his conviction of armed robbery and first-degree murder and his sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. We affirm.

The evidence adduced at the trial below revealed that appellant and his brother, Clinton Jackson, spent the day…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Johnson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fotopoulos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. DuBoise v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API