Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Laro

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1925No. 7363PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The ease is a simple one, involving a daylight crossing accident, in which A. V. Laro lost his life. His widow sued the railway company to recover in her own behalf and that of her two children, a boy and a girl. A jury trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the mother for $8,500, in favor of the son for $3,400, and of the daughter for $5,100, aggregating $17,000. The railway company has appealed.

Laro was traveling alone in a loaded wagon, drawn by two horses, upon a much frequented highway, which crossed the railway track from west to .east, about 4 miles north of the city of Fort Worth.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. I. G.N.R.R. Co. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GaddisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. LeifesteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Letsinger v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API