Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Laro
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The ease is a simple one, involving a daylight crossing accident, in which A. V. Laro lost his life. His widow sued the railway company to recover in her own behalf and that of her two children, a boy and a girl. A jury trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the mother for $8,500, in favor of the son for $3,400, and of the daughter for $5,100, aggregating $17,000. The railway company has appealed.
Laro was traveling alone in a loaded wagon, drawn by two horses, upon a much frequented highway, which crossed the railway track from west to .east, about 4 miles north of the city of Fort Worth.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- I. G.N.R.R. Co. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GaddisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co. v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. LeifesteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Letsinger v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.