Legal Opinion

State v. Feehan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 1987No. C4-86-1827PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

James Paul Feehan appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of working in protected waters without a permit in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 105.41 and 105.42 (1984). On appeal, he raises a number of issues relating to admission of evidence at trial. He also contends that section 105.42 is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

This case involves the unauthorized use of public waters, specifically Big Sandy Lake, a reservoir in Aitkin County, Minnesota. During the summer of 1985, Feehan purchased…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WiskowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API