Legal Opinion

French v. Kensico Cemetery

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The intention of the parties is clear that the defendant should accept the fund and invest it in interest-bearing securities and apply the income for the perpetual care of a burial plot. No purpose is served by attempted classification of the relationship created by the agreement of the parties. An agreement or a trust for such purpose is valid and enforcible under our statutes. (Personal Property Law, § 13-a; Membership Corporation Law, § 76; Surrogate’s Court Act, § 314.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur;…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jewish Center of Mount Vernon, Inc. v. Mount Eden Cemetery Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Frankel v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re the Estate of HagreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API