Legal Opinion

Omimex Canada, Ltd. v. State, Department of Revenue

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2008No. DA 07-0356PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DESCHAMPS

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶1 Omimex Canada, Ltd. (“Omimex”) appeals from the judgment of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, declaring that the Montana Department of Revenue (“DOR”) may centrally assess Omimex’s property and classify it under § 15-6-141, MCA, as class nine property. We reverse.

¶2 Omimex raises several issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

¶3 Did the District Court err in considering Omimex’s operating characteristics in concluding Omimex was “operating a single and continuous property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Western Energy Co. v. State, Dept. of Rev.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dukes v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Harris v. SmarttMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mitchell v. University of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. David W. v. Paramount Homes, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Omimex Canada, Ltd. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Bresnan Communications, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hiland Crude, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API