Heartley v. Beaum
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of the city and county of Philadelphia, on case stated. Jan. 21, 22, 23. — In 1794, Boudinot et al. being seised in fee of a lot at the S. W. comer of Lombard and Seventh streets.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of the city and county of Philadelphia, on case stated. Jan. 21, 22, 23. — In 1794, Boudinot et al. being seised in fee of a lot at the S. W. comer of Lombard and Seventh streets. Sixty-two feet on Lombard street, by one hundred and two feet deep, conveyed the same to Cadwallader Griffith, reserving a ground-rent of |84 53. In 1796, Griffith conveyed to Conner lots numbered 3 & 4 in the plan A, reserving a ground-rent of $53 33, with clause of distress and re-entry, and covenanted against the paramount rent. In 1797, Conner conveyed to Faimin lot 3, subject to $26…
1Opinion of the CourtSergeant, J.
— In this case, the levy, the sheriff’s return, and the sheriff’s deed, all correspond and embrace a lot of ground on the south side of Lombard street, and west side of Delaware Seventh street, containing sixty-two feet on Lombard street, and one hundred and two feet on Seventh street; bounded on the north by Lombard street, on the east by Seventh street, on the south by a twelve feet alley, and on the west by other ground of Boudinot and Bradford, together with the rents, issues, and profits thereof, subject to a yearly ground-rent of $84. At the time of the levy, the defendant in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Streaper v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- Inman v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carroll v. MinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Wasserman v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896