Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 145 v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Rogers :
I must dissent from two portions of the majority’s opinion. The majority’s affirmance of paragraph (4) of the Commission’s order is contrary to our decision in Span and Walnut Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 334, 325 A. 2d 678 (1974). Paragraph (4) requires the appellants “to submit written reports to the Commission stating the name, race and affiliations to the Lodge of all children in the bantam howling league.” In Span we wrote: “The requirement of the order that the appellants maintain records…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Span v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974