Putze v. Saginaw Valley Mutual Fire-Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair; Atkinson, J. Assumpsit by Gustave Putze against the Saginaw Valley Mutual Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff, being owner of a building used for the purposes of a hotel and saloon by one Dwyer and his partner, tenants of the plaintiff, procured a policy of insurance against fire in the defendant company, dated January 12, 1897. In the following March, Dwyer and partner left the premises, and by consent of the plaintiff one Armstrong entered as tenant; and he ran the hotel and saloon, without a license authorizing him to sell liquors, until the premises were burned, on May 8, 1897. On May 22, 1897, an agreement was made for an appraisal of the property. This was made, and it is agreed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. GreinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- First Baptist Church v. Citizens' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- John W., Jr. And Gloria Furrow v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Board of Supervisors v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Crowley Bros. v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Rubin & Cherry Shows, Inc. v. DinsmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928