Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Dulles, Secretary of State

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 15, 1954No. 22913_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The government 1 concedes that Gennaro Monaco was a citizen. Accordingly, the government had the burden of proving that he had expatriated himself. We agree with Acheson v. Maenza, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 202 F.2d 453, 456, which held that the burden in such a case is like that in a denaturalization proceeding, i. e., the evidence of expatriation must be “clear, unequivocal and convincing”. 2 We think such evidence was wanting here. The crucial issue was whether Gennaro Monaco took the oath of allegiance to the Kingdom of Ita ly. The proof offered by the government consisted of the following:(a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Acheson, Secretary of State v. MaenzaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vincenzo Augello v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Enrico Soccodato v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Delmore v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Felice Bruni v. John Foster Dulles, Angelantonio Sbrocca v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Kenji Kamada v. DullesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API