Legal Opinion

Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. Dresel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard Prendergast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

Appellee, Dresel was in the possession of lots 2 to 15, inclusive, in sub-block 10, subdivision of block 13, in Sheffield’s addition to Chicago. Lots 2 to 9 were held under a lease which expires July 1, 1885. Lots 10 to 15 were owned in fee by appellee. The lots 2 to 15, inclusive, have been occupied and cultivated by appellee as an entirety, within one inclosure, since 1870. The fee to lots 2 to 5, inclusive, was in appellant, having been purchased of appellee’s landlord, Lewis, pending the proceedings. The appellant, by its amended petition, undertook to condemn only so much of Dresel’s…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Department of Conservation v. FranzenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API