Gummerson v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. O. A. Lucas, Judge. (1) Plaintiff’s petition does not state a cause of action against defendant. Barnett v. Paper Mill Co., 149 Mo. App. 498; Lohmeyer v. Cordage Co., 234 Mo. 685; Cole v. Lead Co., 240 Mo. 397; Bair v. Heibel, 103 Mo. App. 621; Roundtree v. Cement Co., 3.56 Mo. App. 679. (2) No cause of action was proved. Brands v. Car Co., 213 Mo. 698; Saversniek v. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co., 141 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. O. A. Lucas, Judge. (1) Plaintiff’s petition does not state a cause of action against defendant. Barnett v. Paper Mill Co., 149 Mo. App. 498; Lohmeyer v. Cordage Co., 234 Mo. 685; Cole v. Lead Co., 240 Mo. 397; Bair v. Heibel, 103 Mo. App. 621; Roundtree v. Cement Co., 3.56 Mo. App. 679. (2) No cause of action was proved. Brands v. Car Co., 213 Mo. 698; Saversniek v. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co., 141 Mo. App. 509; Cbrismer v. Telephone Co., 194 Mo. 189; Coin v. Lounge Co., 222 Mo. 488; Shinners v. Mullins, 136 Mo. App. 298; Brandt v. Beweries Co.,…
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Plaintiff was injured while in the service of defendant as a common laborer and sued to recover his damages on the ground that his injury was caused by a negligent breach of defendant’s duty to exercise reasonable care to furnish him a reasonably safe place in which to work. The answer is a general denial and pleas of contributory negligence and assumed risk. A trial in the circuit court resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
Defendant, a manufacturer of nuts and bolts, employed plaintiff to work at common labor in and about its factory at Sheffield near Kansas…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mather v. RillstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Coin v. John H. Talge Lounge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Fox v. Peninsular White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Morgan v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whelan v. United Zinc & Chemical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915