Jenke v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from the conviction for the offense of robbery by assault with one prior conviction alleged for enhancement. The jury assessed the punishment at life under the provisions of Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.
The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. It is appellant’s contention that the State failed to negative the consent of the victim, Dorothy Mahaffey. In a robbery case, it is only necessary to prove that the property was taken by force and violence. Barfield v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 256, 129 S.W.2d 310. It is not necessary to negative the victim’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Craig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Banks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Batro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
- Sikalasinh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.