Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Wadley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1938No. 5775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

A proposition of law only is submitted by this appeal. It is this: Will the tender of the balance due on the purchase price of a sale of real estate, made subsequent to service but prior to judgment in a suit to rescind the sale on account of' the nonpayment of said part of the price, abate the action to rescind?

On November 15, 1934, J. K. Wadley and W. T. Gleason, defendants in the present rule, sold and conveyed to Walter F. Bailey, plaintiff in rule the E.% of N. E.J4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 10 West, situated in Webster parish. The vendors reserved for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watson v. FeibelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Southport Mill, Ltd. v. AnsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Perkins v. Frazer & NasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thistlethwaite v. Mayor & Board of Aldermen of City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Collins v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Collins v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API