Legal Opinion

Maze v. Heinze

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1894Published

Memorandum.—Assumpsit on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle County; the Hon. Charles Blanchard, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the December term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This suit was begun before a justice of the peace by appellee against appellants, as partners under the name of Walter H. Maze & Co. Plaintiff recovered before the justice, and on appeal to the Circuit Court the cause was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in a finding and judgment for plaintiff for $197.93 and costs.

On the trial in the Circuit Court the plaintiff offered in evidence the instrument upon which the suit was brought, which was as follows:

Peru, Ill., July 8, 1891.

Received of C. W. Harvey,

3 gross brass hinge window locks at $13.33

9 “ silver plated “ “ at 15.85

for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Siegel v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API