Legal Opinion

Holz v. Rinacente Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated October 22, 1992, which granted the defendants’ motion, made at the completion of the plaintiffs’ opening statement, to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint after the opening statement. We disagree. The trial court correctly dismissed the case after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Kobet v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Giammarino v. Angelo's Royal Pastry Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aversano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. M.D. v. Pasadena Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Santello v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Milne v. CheemaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API