Legal Opinion

Barr v. Ehrlich

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1974No. 74-82PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Judge.

This will be a two stage appeal.

The first stage deals with the administration of Rule 1.420(e), F.R.C.P., 30 F.S. A., which provides:

“(e) Failure to Prosecute. All actions in which it affirmatively appears that no action has been taken by filing of pleadings, order of court or .otherwise for a period of one year shall be dismissed by the court on its own motion or on motion of any interested person, whether a party to the action or not, after reasonable notice to the parties, unless a party shows good cause in writing why the action should remain pending at least five days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. Victoire Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Laug v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barr v. EhrlichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API