Legal Opinion

Smith v. Loughman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaley, J.

This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the State Tax Commission and the State Comptroller to refund to petitioner the sum of $560.33 and interest, paid by her pursuant to chapter 143 of the Laws of 1925 (Tax Law, art. 10-A), as a transfer tax assessed upon certain real property situated in this State.

The deceased, the owner of the property in question, was a nonresident. The petitioner paid the tax within the time limited in order to obtain a deduction of interest, but protested the payment. Subsequently the statute under which the tax was assessed was declared…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. People Ex Rel. Clark v. GilchristNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Smith v. LoughmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. People ex rel. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Dick v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Baer v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People ex rel. Bankers Trust Co. v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API