Legal Opinion

Pfaff v. Heizman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1951No. 4-9329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is a sequel to Pfaff v. Clements, 213 Ark. 852, 213 S. W. 2d 356. In that case we upheld a family settlement, wherein all of the adult heirs of Samuel Ernest Pfaff allowed Mrs. Annie Mae Pfaff (widow of Terrence O. Pfaff) to receive their interests in the share of her husband in the estate of his father, Samuel Ernest Pfaff. But the opinion in that case recited that Carl E. Heizman II was a minor at the time of said settlement. He repudiated the settlement and is now claiming Ms interest against Annie1 Mae Pfaff. As the widow of Terrence O. Pfaff she claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dean v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Stewart v. SmileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  3. Chowning v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Hall v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  5. Doke v. Benton County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hope v. HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API