Pfaff v. Heizman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
This is a sequel to Pfaff v. Clements, 213 Ark. 852, 213 S. W. 2d 356. In that case we upheld a family settlement, wherein all of the adult heirs of Samuel Ernest Pfaff allowed Mrs. Annie Mae Pfaff (widow of Terrence O. Pfaff) to receive their interests in the share of her husband in the estate of his father, Samuel Ernest Pfaff. But the opinion in that case recited that Carl E. Heizman II was a minor at the time of said settlement. He repudiated the settlement and is now claiming Ms interest against Annie1 Mae Pfaff. As the widow of Terrence O. Pfaff she claims…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dean v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Stewart v. SmileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Chowning v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Hall v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Doke v. Benton County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hope v. HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951