Legal Opinion
Littenstein v. Dorcich (In Re Littenstein)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1983No. BAP Nos. EC 83-1041 EV As, EC 83-1043 EV As, Bankruptcy No. 281-04535-D-11, Adv. No. 282-0609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIOTT, Bankruptcy Judge:
The debtors appeal from the trial court’s denial of their application for entry of the Appellee’s default. Appellants were granted leave to appeal. We conclude that the court below did not abuse its discretion and affirm its decision.
The debtors filed a complaint against Ap-pellees alleging 21 separate claims for re-, lief. Each claim for relief is based upon a state-created private right. See Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co., 458 U.S. 50, 71, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 2871, 73 L.Ed.2d 598, 615 (1982). Appellees’ last day to answer was June 11, 1982. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Clayton R. Whittlesey v. Weyerhauser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Mileasing Co. v. Allavena (In Re Allavena)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Continental Bank v. Cantwell (In Re Cantwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. Castelo (In Re Campbell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Republic Bank v. Fineberg (In Re Fineberg)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re WallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991