Legal Opinion

Waddle v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 6, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

George Waddle, a prisoner at the reformatory at LeGrange, filed in the Old-ham Circuit Court his petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is being illegally restrained. He based that plea on his contention that the judgment of the Pulaski Circuit Court, by which he was sentenced to prison, was a void judgment. The trial court denied the petition for writ *234of habeas corpus on the authority of Ayers v. Davis, Ky., 377 S.W.2d 154, since Waddle had made no showing that the remedy afforded him by RCr 11.42 is inadequate.

The trial court ruled correctly. The mere fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayers v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Richardson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API