Legal Opinion

Matlack v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 2, 1912Published

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Per curiam

The respondent, as judge of the Burlington Circuit Court, made an order opening a judgment by default in an action pending in that court wherein relator was plaintiff; whereupon relator applied to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to require said judge to vacate such order. The Su*740.preme Court made a rule refusing this application, and this rule is what is sought to be reversed by the present writ of error.

In Neptune Township v. Mannion, Collector, &c., 44 Vroom 816, this court in dealing with a case where the Supreme Court had made a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SpringerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. American Transportation & Navigation Co. v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. School District v. MannionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  4. Morris & Cummings Dredging Co. v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API