Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Texoma Wholesale Jewelers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1957No. 6154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

For convenience, the plaintiff in error,. Victor Alexander, d/b/a Alexander Jewelry Co., will be referred to as appellant,, and the defendant in error, Texoma Wholesale Jewelers, will be referred to as appel-lee. The parties will also be referred to in accordance with their respective designations in the trial court; i. e., Texoma Wholesale Jewelers will be referred to as-plaintiff, and Alexander will be referred to-as defendant.

Plaintiff sued for $1,601.82 alleged to be-due it by defendant for goods, wares and merchandise it alleged it had sold and delivered to defendant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oldham v. MedearisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wall & Carr v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Gause v. RodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Nichols v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Artex Refining Co. v. Pollard & LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Biscamp v. Zeno Carpet CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Big K Furniture Company, Inc. v. Covey CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Cook v. Goodyear Service StoresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Brunson v. Pittman & HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. General Leasing Co. v. Saxon Business Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API