Legal Opinion

Clausells v. Ramírez

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided June 25, 1913No. 949Published

Appeal from the District Court of Ponce. Tlie facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolf

On September 16, 1911, the defendant and appellant in this case filed his third amended answer to a complaint in revindication pending in the District Court of Ponce. To that part of the answer styled “New Matter” the complainant demurred and the demurrer was sustained to. that extent. The case went to trial and judgment was rendered for the complainant and appellee. The first ground of error or series of errors alleged by the appellant is that by reason of the action of the court the defendant was deprived of his right of filing a plea of prescription.

The answer of the defendant was filed on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. M. Gilman & Co. v. CosgroveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Little v. JacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Carson v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API