Legal Opinion
Mansfield v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1889PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I think the defendant's exception was well taken to the submission to the jury of the question of interest upon the amount of damages they should find against the defendant. The action was to recover for breach of contract. In such cases whether interest is recoverable does not rest in the discretion of the jury, but it is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- McMahon v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- McMaster v. . the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Van Rensselaer v. JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Lindenborg v. M & L Builders and Brokers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gray v. . Central R.R. Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.