Legal Opinion
Dept. of Labor & Indus. v. Lanier Brugh
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 21, 2006No. 56192-8-I, 56821-3-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
147 P.3d 588 (2006)
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent,
v.
LANIER BRUGH, a foreign corporation; Skyline Mail Carriers, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellants, and
Dill's Star Route, Inc., a foreign Corporation, Defendant.
Nos. 56192-8-I, 56821-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 21, 2006.
Publication Ordered and Reconsideration Denied November 22, 2006.
Amanda J. Goss, Attorney General Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Philip Albert Talmadge, Talmadge Law Group PLLC, Tukwila, WA, for Appellants.
GROSSE, J.
¶ 1 The question of whether federal law preempts state law is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- M.G. v. Yakima Sch. Dist. No. 7Washington Supreme Court · 2024