Legal Opinion

State v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 12, 2012No. 2011-426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. In this consolidated appeal, defendants Paul Edmonds and Francis Cobb appeal from their conditional pleas to driving with a suspended license, claiming that the Windsor Criminal Division erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence. Defendants argue that they were subject to investigative stops unsupported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. They alternatively argue that Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution affords greater protection against such detentions than does the Fourth Amendment,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph VanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. United States v. Dennis George HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GloverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. TumaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. United States v. Joshua PylesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. Kevin W. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API