Legal Opinion
New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff corporations own and operate a number of bus lines *893in the city of New York, which carry approximately 1,200,000 passengers daily. They will he referred to hereinafter as the Companies. The defendants are the officers of two labor unions — both unincorporated associations — many of whose members are employed as drivers and clerical personnel by the Companies. They will be referred to hereinafter as the Unions. The Unions are the collective bargaining agents of the drivers and clerical employees in their relations with the Companies.
A…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Citizens Bldg. of West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In the Matter of David Livingston, as President of District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Aflcio v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of IsraelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Zdanok v. Glidden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Upholsterers' International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio v. The American Pad & Textile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.