Legal Opinion

Village of Fairlawn v. Fuller

Akron Municipal Court

Decided October 21, 1966No. Nos. 330724-39, incl., 332655-58, incl., 332661-71, incl., 332673-77, incl. and 332680PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Bebg, J.

On May 3,1965, the Council of the Village of Fairlawn, Summit County, Ohio, enacted ordinance No. 1965-50, forbidding the transaction of business on Sunday in language identical with that of Section 3773.24, Revised Code, but providing somewhat more severe penalties.

The 37 cases before the court are prosecutions for violation of the ordinance, the affidavit in each case charging that the defendant “did engage in common labor on Sunday” by the sale of one or more items of merchandise. All of the cases were commenced in the Mayor’s Court of the Village of Fairlawn during August and September,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Chy Lung v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. City of Lyndhurst v. McFarlaneCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1969
  3. Jackson v. StateGirard Municipal Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API