Legal Opinion

People v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the prosecutor’s opening statement complied with CPL 260.30 (3) (see, People v Adams, 139 AD2d 794, 795; People v Parker, 97 AD2d 620, 621). Further, though there were defects in the prosecutor’s opening statement, they did not so prejudice defendant as to require a new trial (see, *1034People v De Tore, 34 NY2d 199, 207-208, cert denied sub nom. Wedra v New York, 419 US 1025; People v Campos, 138 AD2d 500).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. De ToreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. People v. CamposAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API