Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Woods

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1986No. 86-4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The trial judge set aside a jury verdict for the appellant, defendant below, in this truck collision case and granted the appellee a new trial. On appeal we look to see if the trial judge abused his discretion in so acting. Yutterman v. Williams, 289 Ark. 77, 709 S.W.2d 86 (1986); Clayton v. Wagnon, 276 Ark. 124, 633 S.W.2d 19 (1983). The judge is permitted to weigh the evidence and if he finds that a verdict is clearly contrary to the preponderance of the evidence, he may set it aside and grant a new trial. ARCP Rule 59 (a) (6).

The accident occurred at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Yutterman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Turrise v. CraneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Lamons v. CroftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API