Wessendorf v. Carter

*315OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

We are of opinion that tho Court of Common Pleas was correct in reversing the case. It must be remembered that Wessendorf, the plaintiff, as assignee of Wissel has no greater rights than Wissel, and any defense that might be set up against Wissel by the Carters must be considered as binding upon Wessendorf, the assignee of the claim.

There is evidence tending to show that Wissel relied wholly on the proposition that Bruce had some claim, and that Carters could not give title as provided in the contract. Whatever Wissel may have thought of Bruce’s claim, the claim as…