In re H. E. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
The maternal great-grandparents of H. E. M. and K. L. M. (“appellants”) appeal from the juvenile court’s order denying their motion to intervene in this deprivation action. Because a trial court’s ruling on a motion to intervene must be appealed according to the provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 governing interlocutory appeals, we dismiss this appeal.
The father of H. E. M. and K. L. M. was arrested for numerous felony offenses, and both parents admitted smoking methamphetamine in the children’s presence. The trial court ordered the children taken into immediate custody, and a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morman v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Wallace v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Atlanta Development Company, Ltd. v. Peel & Sons, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of D. G., a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019