Legal Opinion

Irving v. Mazda Motor Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 5, 1998No. 97-8021PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendants. The district court decided that Plaintiffs state law claims were preempted by federal law. We conclude that. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (“FMVSS”) 208, 49 C.F.R. § 571.208, (enacted under the authority of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq.) does preempt Plaintiffs state law claims. And, we affirm the grant of summary judgment.

Background

Plaintiff Juliette Irving filed suit against Defendant Mazda Motor Corporation on behalf of her…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,189, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1117 Juliette Irving, as Guardian of the Persons and Property of Bryana Bashir, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bonita L. Irving, Deceased v. Mazda Motor Corp. A.K.A. Mazda Motors Corp. F.K.A. Toyo Kogyo, Ltd., Mazda (North America), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API