Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rubin
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
C. Raymond Radigan, J.
This is a proceeding for a construction of article second of the codicil to decedent’s will which in effect provides that if at any time the coexecutors should disagree with respect to the administration of the estate, they are to consult with two named individuals whose directions they are to follow, provided the named advisors agree, and if they cannot, then the court is to decide the matter.
The decedent was survived by a daughter and son, each of whom is named executor. Included as assets of the decedent’s estate are five commercial properties of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Oliver v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Chase National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1990
- Matter of Estate of KerouacNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Nicosia v. LashNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998