Mollaghan v. Varnell
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LAMAR, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. In this sexual-harassment, due-process, gender-discrimination, and retaliation ease, we must decide whether the Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, properly ruled on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). We find that the circuit court properly granted JNOV on the due-process, gender-discrimination, and retaliation claims, but improperly denied JNOV on the sexual-harassment claims. Therefore, we affirm in part, and reverse and render in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. During the time period between July 1, 1999, and June 30,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kenyatta Donta Cheeks v. AutoZone, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Jennifer McIlwain v. Natchez Community Hospital, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Teeuwissen v. Hinds County, MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Henry "Bunky" Partridge v. City of MeridianCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022
- Kenyatta Donta Cheeks v. AutoZone, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.