Legal Opinion

Mollaghan v. Varnell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2012No. 2010-CA-02005-SCTPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this sexual-harassment, due-process, gender-discrimination, and retaliation ease, we must decide whether the Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, properly ruled on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). We find that the circuit court properly granted JNOV on the due-process, gender-discrimination, and retaliation claims, but improperly denied JNOV on the sexual-harassment claims. Therefore, we affirm in part, and reverse and render in part.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. During the time period between July 1, 1999, and June 30,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenyatta Donta Cheeks v. AutoZone, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Jennifer McIlwain v. Natchez Community Hospital, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Teeuwissen v. Hinds County, MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. Henry "Bunky" Partridge v. City of MeridianCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022
  5. Kenyatta Donta Cheeks v. AutoZone, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API