Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Terwilliger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by S. Wightman Stewart against Francis Terwilliger for broker’s commissions. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court from- a judgment for defendant. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant in justice’s court in the city of Detroit in assumpsit to recover as assignee for commissions claimed on a sale of real estate. This suit resulted in a judgment against plaintiff. The case was appealed by plaintiff to the circuit court for the county of Wayne, and a jury, under the charge of the court, rendered a verdict of no cause of action, upon which a judgment was entered in favor of defendant.

*314The facts in the case are that Gordon F. Bennett and Jesse J. Gee were partners in the real estate business, in which defendant was at one time interested,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Redding v. LambMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schram v. PerkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
  2. Soberg v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fredstrom v. Giroux Post, No. 11 of American LegionDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
  4. Barnes v. EschOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rath v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API