Legal Opinion

Sinsel v. Oregon Board of Forestry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. WCB 92-10297; CA A81961Published

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that his chest pains are not compensable. It appears that the Board analyzed the issue of compensability under our decision in Mathel v. Josephine County, 122 Or App 424, 858 P2d 450 (1993). After the Board’s decision, the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Mathel. 319 Or 235, 875 P2d 455 (1994). We cannot determine whether the Board’s decision would have been different had it addressed the issue consistent with the Supreme Court’s reasoning. Consequently, we reverse the decision and remand to the Board for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mathel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API