Legal Opinion
Kizar v. Wittenberg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 20, 1981No. 80-497PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, Judge.
Appellants appeal the issuance of a temporary injunction1 enjoining them from engaging in activities which constitute the unauthorized practice of dentistry. For the reasons set forth, we reverse.
The action below was brought to enjoin alleged violations of Chapter 466, Florida Statutes (1979), the Dental Practice Act. Appellant contended below and contends now that appellee is not the proper party to bring such action. The trial court disagreed and specifically held that appellee was a proper party. Because of our ruling on this point, we will not discuss the other issues…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. Martin Ex Rel. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Williams v. KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Starchk v. WittenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Donaldson v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Donaldson v. ST., DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983