Legal Opinion

Unzelman v. City of Snohomish

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1905No. 5746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered January Y, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits, quieting its title to certain streets and alleys.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is an action to quiet title to land, and an injunction is asked against the city of Snohomish to prevent it from asserting any dominion over the disputed territory, which it claims constitutes public streets and alleys in said city. The complaint alleges that in 1891 the land was duly platted by the then owner into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, as “Mrs. Hogan’s Second Addition to Snohomish;” that it was then inclosed by a fence, was nearly all under *589cultivation, and that the owner resided thereon; that upon the map of said plat was a strip marked as “Third street,” and another…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ralston v. Town of WestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Johnson v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barr v. StrattonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jackson v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Raymond Spencer, et al. v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API