John W. Anderson and Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation of Indiana v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants filed suit against the Commissioner of Patents for a writ of mandamus to require the Commissioner to set down for hearing appellant Anderson’s motions for judgment on the record and to render decisions thereon prior to the taking of testimony in certain pending interference proceedings, the motions being based on a claim of res judicata. The District Court granted the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss and this appeal followed.
In disposing of the motion to dismiss, the District Court (Holtzoff, J.) said:
“The question whether the motion for judgment should be passed upon when made…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Wembley, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Edward J. Brenner, United States Commissioner of Patents, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Goodrich-Gulf Chemicals, Inc., and Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.