Legal Opinion

Durrel Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arnold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1957No. 2442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County dismissing plaintiff’s action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

One Podoyak was the owner of the premises on which he constructed a house. William Luft was the general contractor. Victor Arnold, one of the defendants herein, was a subcontractor engaged to paint the house. Plaintiff, appellant herein, The Durrel Paint & Varnish Company, was the materialman which sold and furnished to Arnold the paint used for painting the house.

The plaintiff brought suit against Arnold for the sum of $149.14 on an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frisch v. AmmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Gannon v. Potter, Teare & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Hoon v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. G. Laird Lumber Co. v. TeitelbaumOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Suburban Heating Co. v. LougherOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Wittkop v. Johnson (In re Johnson, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API